Free Education Comes at a Cost for Marginalized Students

On Sunday, Umesh, a soft-spoken second grader, and a dozen of his classmates clamored to tell a visitor why no children in the village of Raup had returned to their local government school in this remote southeast corner of Uttar Pradesh since March 26.

Amid the competition to be heard, Umesh, 8, turned to a friend and began to demonstrate how, he said, two teacher trainees tethered him and seven of his friends to windows and ceiling fans and beat them. He spread his arms wide and said, “They tied me up and hung me on the window like this.”

Umesh and his friends in the village of Raup, in Sonbhadra district, are Ghasia, which is seen as either a caste or a tribe, depending on whom you ask. Forced out of their former villages in nearby forests because of overcrowding, the Ghasia have migrated to rocky, unoccupied land in Raup’s periphery over the past two decades, their homes now abutting a dusty national highway.

Umesh’s school was included in a Human Rights Watch report released on Tuesday, titled  “They Say We’re Dirty: Denying an Education to India’s Marginalized,” a qualitative study on the type of discrimination that children in the lowest strata of society, like the Ghasia, experience in schools in four states — Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and Andhra Pradesh.

The report cites Unicef’s estimate that 80 million Indian children will drop out before completing elementary school and contends that various forms of discrimination and intimidation contribute significantly to that number.

At school, they said, the other children called them Ghasia as if it were a curse, and when they tried to play with the Kharwar children, they were chased away and spat on.

In a video attached to the Human Rights Watch report, the principal at the time, Farida Khatun, said that it was better if the Ghasia children stayed away from school.

“They don’t bathe, they don’t wear school uniform, and they smell,” she said. “When we ask them why they are so dirty, they say there is no water. The problems of these children will never get solved. Their parents are uneducated. We can’t mix these children with normal children because they are spoiling them, too.”

Sangeeta Devi, one of the two current teachers in training, said that if the Ghasia children were to return, it would be impossible to handle all 205 students. The school’s trainees, who have received no teacher instruction, are little more than babysitters.

“We can’t take care of these kids if they come here. They only listen to the male teachers,” she said, referring to the two men accused of tying Umesh to a window, his friend Dayalu, also 8, to a ceiling fan, and others’ hands behind their backs.

Parents in the Ghasia community expressed little other than injured pride. Most parents interviewed in the village said that beating was the only way to raise obedient children.

Ghasia parents also pointed to their own poverty as a barrier to acceptance at the school. New clothes are an extreme luxury, and many children don’t get them until they reach school-going age. Soap is unaffordable, so sand is used instead. At times, their poverty is so acute that attending school would be a distant-if-present worry. In 2001, during a period of prolonged unemployment in the community, the Ghasia were reduced to eating grass, some of which proved to be mildly poisonous. A total of 18 young Ghasia children died from both starvation and poisoning.

http://india.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/04/22/free-education-comes-at-a-cost-for-marginalized-students/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0

The Photographs of Lewis Hine: The Industrial Revolution and Child Laborers

not directly related to India but this provides an interesting perspective

The Industrial Age that occurred after the Civil War created a demand for labor and many children were drawn into the labor force. Factory wages were so low that children often had to work to help support their families. According to the National Archives, the number of children under the age of 15 who worked in industrial jobs for wages climbed from 1.5 million in 1890 to 2 million in 1910.

Employers viewed children as a bargain: They worked in unskilled jobs for lower wages than adults, and their small hands made them more adept at handling small parts and tools.

Education was seen as a luxury, but one teacher would have a profound impact on our view of child labor. Lewis Hine, was a New York City schoolteacher and photographer, and he believed that a picture could tell a powerful story. He felt so strongly about the abuse of children as workers that he quit his teaching job and became an investigative photographer for the National Child Labor Committee.

Hine believed that if people could see for themselves the abuses and injustice of child labor, they would demand laws to end it. He often tricked his way into factories to take the pictures that factory managers did not want the public to see. He would tell factory owners that he wanted the child laborers in the photos to show the size of the modern machinery.

The National Child Labor Committee was formed in 1904, with a goal to end child labor. The organization received a charter from Congress in 1907. It hired teams of investigators to gather evidence of children working in harsh conditions and then organized exhibitions with photographs and statistics to dramatize the plight of these children. The Children’s Bureau became a federal information clearinghouse in 1912 and i 1913, the Children’s Bureau was transferred to the Department of Labor.

Lewis Hine died in poverty but his photos live on as a reminder of the horrors of child labor and, frankly, the dangers to all workers found in Industrial Age workplaces.

http://ehstoday.com/galleries/photographs-lewis-hine-industrial-revolution-and-child-laborers-photo-gallery?NL=QMN-01&Issue=QMN-01_20140411_QMN-01_240&YM_RID=anant.r.jani@gmail.com&YM_MID=1460304&sfvc4enews=42&cl=article_6