Even As India Pours Billions Into Education, Rural Schools Continue To Totter

Even as India boasts of some of the world’s best engineering and business schools that are a challenge to get into, elementary education in the country, especially in the rural hinterlands, continues to languish, a new survey has revealed.

According to the Annual Status of Education Report (ASER) released Monday by the ASER Centre, which is supported by Indian nonprofit Pratham, less than half the children in grade 5 could read a grade 2 textbook, even as 96 percent of children in the 6-14-year age group enrolled in a school.

In 2014, India increased its education budget by 11 percent to nearly $11 billion, which is 3.3 percent of its Gross Domestic Product.

The report further notes that though enrollment levels in the 6-14 age group are high, “the proportion of 15 to 16 year olds not enrolled in school is substantial.” In rural areas, 15.9 percent of boys and 17.3 percent of girls in this age group are currently out of school, it notes.

The report also takes aim at the inequities of the government’s approach to solve the country’s education problem.

“Well into the second decade of this century, the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD) did not really take interest in learning achievements. Its sole focus was on provisions, inputs and infrastructure,” it says. “The thinking seemed implicitly linear; first all infrastructure needs have to be taken care of and then quality issues can be addressed. Unfortunately, in states where infrastructure issues were not severe, there too states followed the MHRD cue and did nothing significant about basic learning levels,” it goes on to say.

In 2009, India passed the Right to Education law, which made education a fundamental right of every Indian citizen and provides for free and compulsory elementary education to every child between six to 14 years of age. However, over 640 million children, or more than a third of all 6-14 year olds, in India continue to pay for their education. Moreover, about 4.7 million children go to schools not recognized by the government.

“…  the paradox of the last ten years is that while governments spent money on building schools and hiring teachers by the lakhs (hundreds of thousands), and also provided free textbooks, uniforms, and mid-day meals, the net enrollment in government schools went down and enrollment in private schools went up sharply, especially in the primary stage,” the report says.

http://www.ibtimes.com/even-india-pours-billions-education-rural-schools-continue-totter-1783004

_________
The report on the status of education in 2014 by ASER, an NGO, says basic reading levels in India are disheartening and largely unchanged from five years ago.

This applies to the children’s mother tongue as well as English, where there has been a decline in upper grades. In 2009, 60 per cent children in class 8 could read simple sentences in English; in 2014, only about 47 per cent could, ASER finds.

Even with math, basic subtractions like 46-29, or 63-39 are proving to be a hurdle for class 4 students. Data from rural schools shows that close to 60 percent still struggle with it. In fact, over the years, there has been a decline in the ability of rural school children to do basic two digit subtraction. In 2010, 57.7 per cent children in class 4 could do subtraction, but 2014 has seen a drop to 40.3 per cent.

It isn’t any better for basic division sums either. Whereas 36.2 per cent students in class 5 could do division in 2010, the number has dropped to 26.1 per cent in 2014. While in class 2, 19.5 per cent children could not recognise numbers up to nine.

Even with English, less than 25 per cent children can read basic sentences like ‘what is the time?’ Or ‘I like to read’, fluently.

http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/many-of-india-s-children-can-t-add-can-t-read-reveals-report-648019

India Health Budget: Did Lower Tax Receipts And Lack Of Spending Force India To Cut Back?

India’s public health care system may have a problem. Earlier this week, the government slashed its $5 billion annual health care budget by a fifth, almost certainly straining a system that is creaking at the core and on which the country already spends an abysmally low amount.

India spends just 1.3 percent of its Gross Domestic Product (GDP) on public health care, and even including expenditure on private health care, the figure stands at 4.3 percent. Comparative data show that in terms of health care expenditure as a percentage of GDP, India significantly lags behind Brazil, Russia, China and South Africa, countries that are typically lumped together in the so-called BRICS bloc.

The Narendra Modi-led Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government faces fiscal constraints, necessitating the cut. The Modi government is facing a tax-revenue deficit of as much as one trillion rupees ($15.7 billion), forcing it to cut back on expenditure to meet its fiscal deficit target of 4.1 percent. However, this is not the first time that this has happened. In the previous fiscal year, the Congress party-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) regime, under the premiership of Manmohan Singh, too had pruned the health budget by a similar amount.

But apart from the sagging economy, this cut in health expenditure could be an indicator of problems in financial management in the health ministry. Data from the Indian finance ministry’s mid-year analysis show that until September this year, the country’s health ministry had spent just about 42 percent, or less than half of the funds allocated to it in the annual budget. Proportionally, this is even less than the 48 percent it had spent in the same period last year when the Congress-led regime was in power.

The government’s own rules prohibit ministries from spending over 33 percent or one-third of their annual allocations in the last quarter of the financial year (January to March). This means that if a ministry wishes to exhaust its allocated funds, it has to spend at least two-thirds of its allocation between April and December of a financial year, failing which its spending would be restricted.

When the government does not spend enough, the citizen must. Typically, personal health care costs involve the cost of medical care (including hospitalization) and the cost of medicines. Government data from 2011 to 2012 show that while 80 percent of the non-hospitalization medical expenditure was on medicines in urban areas, the figure for rural India was 75 percent.

http://www.ibtimes.com/india-health-budget-did-lower-tax-receipts-lack-spending-force-india-cut-back-1767460

India’s Mental Health Crisis

On Oct. 10, the government of India announced an ambitious new policy to provide universal mental health services. The policy, the country’s first on mental health, is admirable for its focus on the needs of the country’s poor, on lifting widespread stigma around mental health disorders and on preventing suicide. A bill to make the new policy law is awaiting approval by Parliament.

India has the highest number of suicides in the world. According to the World Health Organization, of 804,000 suicides recorded worldwide in 2012, 258,000 were in India. Indian youths between 15 and 29 years old kill themselves at a rate of 35.5 deaths per 100,000 — the highest in the world — and suicide has surpassed maternal mortality as the leading cause of death of young Indian women. A report from Human Rights Watch released in December exposed the horrific conditions in institutions where too many Indian women with mental and intellectual disabilities are confined, many against their will, and where some are subject to physical and sexual abuse and electric-shock therapy.

Unfortunately, the new policy may be almost impossible to translate into action. On Dec. 23, the government ordered cuts in the health budget of nearly 20 percent, from $5 billion to a little more than $4 billion. Given other serious health needs, the “fresh funds” promised by the government to pay for new mental health services and train qualified mental-health professionals are unlikely to materialize.

This is a pity. There is only one psychiatrist for every 343,000 Indians currently, too few to reduce the shameful suicide rate. Among other problems are depression, acute economic insecurity, anxiety among youths over educational success, and distress among young women caught in a bind between the opportunities of a changing India and pressure from traditionally minded families to marry.

Unless Prime Minister Narendra Modi reverses course, his impressive new policies will end up exactly like the development projects of the past administrations he excoriated during his campaign: high-minded pronouncements on paper with zero delivery in practice.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/31/opinion/indias-mental-health-crisis.html?_r=0